Joined
·
19 Posts
If the 1999 Dodge Charger R/T Concept car is going to be put into production and raced in NASCAR, then you are my best friend. In 1970, I was fortunate to witness Richard Petty taking the checkered flag at Dover Downs in a winged Plymouth Superbird. It and many other MOPAR victories and innovations have kept me in the Chrysler faithful all of these years. I'd go out and buy the 1999 Dodge Charger R/T concept car as soon as it hit the showroom floor.
On the other hand, if the ugly Mustang II/Pontiac Fiero look-alike that appeared in a recent issue of Popular Hot Rod is going to be passed off as the next Dodge Charger, then I will have to take my business to another automaker.
Also, this smacks of a bait & switch routine. First, you show us the outstanding 1999 Charger concept, then bust us in the chops with something that looks as if it was poorly chiseled from a solid block of iron with a rusty screwdriver.
Popular Hot Rod spoke of the Mustang II/Fiero look-alike as being tailored to a 300C/Magnum frame. Supposedly, it's nose is a spinoff of the 300C which will be a dated design by the time this counterfeit Charger goes into production.
To design cars like the original Chargers and contort it to fit on an existing platform to save some bucks is ludicrous. It would be losing its original identity, appeal and all of the things that made the 60's & 70's Chargers an icon.
Remember the winged 1969 Dodge Daytona? Well, it was an aerodynamic 200+ MPH thoroughbred on the NASCAR circuit. Years later, in an unbelievable and apparent attempt to make some quick bucks, Chrysler slapped the heralded Daytona name on a four banger that had the mystique & pedigree of a neutered Yugo.
It would be better to save the Charger name for a worthy heir to its name and history. If Chrysler does otherwise, all that it'll do is tick off once loyal customers and possibly hoodwink a handful of naive youngsters sporting their learners permits. Instead Chrysler could call this new vehicle the icecream truck, or the shoebox, or something more suitable to emphasize its aerodynamic prowess.
If a Ferrari nameplate suddenly appeared on a Ford Pinto look-alike there would be justified and widespread outrage. Encouragingly, none of the commercial airlines have yet opted to paint the name SR-71 Blackbird, along with a Skunkworks logo, on its jets.
P.S. I had stopped watching NASCAR when Chrysler left the sport a couple of decades ago. I returned to watching NASCAR when Chrysler brought the appealing Dodge Intrepid (I own one) to racing. If Dodge tries to pass off the Mustang II/Fiero revamp as a Charger, I will spend my Sunday afternoons on the golf course instead, but I won't be driving a Chrysler product to get there. That’s how strongly I feel about this.
On the other hand, if the ugly Mustang II/Pontiac Fiero look-alike that appeared in a recent issue of Popular Hot Rod is going to be passed off as the next Dodge Charger, then I will have to take my business to another automaker.
Also, this smacks of a bait & switch routine. First, you show us the outstanding 1999 Charger concept, then bust us in the chops with something that looks as if it was poorly chiseled from a solid block of iron with a rusty screwdriver.
Popular Hot Rod spoke of the Mustang II/Fiero look-alike as being tailored to a 300C/Magnum frame. Supposedly, it's nose is a spinoff of the 300C which will be a dated design by the time this counterfeit Charger goes into production.
To design cars like the original Chargers and contort it to fit on an existing platform to save some bucks is ludicrous. It would be losing its original identity, appeal and all of the things that made the 60's & 70's Chargers an icon.
Remember the winged 1969 Dodge Daytona? Well, it was an aerodynamic 200+ MPH thoroughbred on the NASCAR circuit. Years later, in an unbelievable and apparent attempt to make some quick bucks, Chrysler slapped the heralded Daytona name on a four banger that had the mystique & pedigree of a neutered Yugo.
It would be better to save the Charger name for a worthy heir to its name and history. If Chrysler does otherwise, all that it'll do is tick off once loyal customers and possibly hoodwink a handful of naive youngsters sporting their learners permits. Instead Chrysler could call this new vehicle the icecream truck, or the shoebox, or something more suitable to emphasize its aerodynamic prowess.
If a Ferrari nameplate suddenly appeared on a Ford Pinto look-alike there would be justified and widespread outrage. Encouragingly, none of the commercial airlines have yet opted to paint the name SR-71 Blackbird, along with a Skunkworks logo, on its jets.
P.S. I had stopped watching NASCAR when Chrysler left the sport a couple of decades ago. I returned to watching NASCAR when Chrysler brought the appealing Dodge Intrepid (I own one) to racing. If Dodge tries to pass off the Mustang II/Fiero revamp as a Charger, I will spend my Sunday afternoons on the golf course instead, but I won't be driving a Chrysler product to get there. That’s how strongly I feel about this.