This is the REAL Charger Competitor - Page 8 - Dodge Charger Forums
Are you interested in the Dodge Challenger? Visit the Challenger Forum @ ChallengerTalk.com for your Dodge Challenger information!

Auto Insurance

» Featured Product
Wheel & Tire Center

Go Back   Dodge Charger Forums > Off-Topic Area > Off-Topic

Off-Topic Anything not Charger-related having legitimate subject matter goes here, as long as it is work-safe. **Please post ALL social & 'just for fun' threads in Charger Chat ONLY!**

ChargerForums.com is the premier Dodge Charger Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #71  
Old 12-11-2012, 10:43 AM
Auto426 Auto426 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 45
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by legmaker View Post
exactly my point mco........... unfortunately members like to quote magazines and be critical based on what is often, biased information. gm has never impressed me with anything. yes the new ctsv does have some very cool technology in their shock set ups, but i buy a car for the overall package. i find it humorous that we are discussing the "real" competition of a car that is not even on the dealer lots as far as i know, but rather something that was read in a magizine......
As far as I know, the Chevy SS is still an idea, not even a per-production vehicle yet. I believe all they have really shown so far was the Sprint Cup car with a "SS" body, part of NASCAR's new efforts to make their car of tomorrow start looking like the cars they take their names from. Other than that, I know of no specs or even spy shots of pre-production models testing yet.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #72  
Old 12-11-2012, 12:27 PM
Cl00686's Avatar
Cl00686 Cl00686 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Abilene Tx
Posts: 445
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Couple of pics of the Nascar

Sent from my MB855 using AutoGuide.Com Free App
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	uploadfromtaptalk1355254026419.jpg
Views:	29
Size:	74.1 KB
ID:	72080   Click image for larger version

Name:	uploadfromtaptalk1355254043152.jpg
Views:	25
Size:	75.2 KB
ID:	72081  
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #73  
Old 12-11-2012, 12:31 PM
Lil_dj24's Avatar
Lil_dj24 Lil_dj24 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 387
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Auto426 View Post
As far as I know, the Chevy SS is still an idea, not even a per-production vehicle yet. I believe all they have really shown so far was the Sprint Cup car with a "SS" body, part of NASCAR's new efforts to make their car of tomorrow start looking like the cars they take their names from. Other than that, I know of no specs or even spy shots of pre-production models testing yet.
Spy shots of SS http://m.autoblog.com/photos/chevrolet-ss-spy-shots/


Sent from my iPhone using AutoGuide.com App
__________________
2007: SRT8GC - 440.
2008: Daytona R/t Charger: GONE BUT NOT FORGOTTEN 2/23/13
2009: SRT8 Challenger - Tune, Cams, Heads, Basic Bolt Ons, Working On 440 To Match Jeep
2013: SRT8 Charger: Tinted Windows
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #74  
Old 12-11-2012, 12:46 PM
Malcolm65 Malcolm65 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 261
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The CTS-V is a much better handling car than the SRT8. I don't think that really is debatable. It obviously is faster also.

But it is not that much faster and it is flat out UGLY with all caps on

It looks like a HS drawing project.

And it has about as much room inside as an Avenger, not a Charger
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #75  
Old 12-11-2012, 12:59 PM
AFPVet AFPVet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 514
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
You can get an SRT-8 for under $50k... you won't be able to get a CTS-V for under $65k. In fact, I've seen brand new SRT-8s on the lot for $42k.

If you can afford a $65k car, go for it. I just don't think I could justify the extra cost over what you can get with a loaded SRT-8.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #76  
Old 12-11-2012, 02:40 PM
legmaker's Avatar
legmaker legmaker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: orlando, fl
Posts: 3,309
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
exactly^^^^^^
__________________

10.06 @ 140mph PWR forged 6.1 w/F1A Procharger @17psi / AfterHours Mopar Perf. installed!!!
my real name is CHRIS
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #77  
Old 12-11-2012, 03:45 PM
Malcolm65 Malcolm65 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 261
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
If I was in the market right now I would get a Super Bee for $40K and spend $10K on a decent blower and call it a day. That will be as powerful as any Caddy, look much better, and have room inside for the fellas on party night
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #78  
Old 12-11-2012, 04:03 PM
GTO_04 GTO_04 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Noblesville, Indiana
Posts: 439
Thanks: 42
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by AFPVet View Post
You can get an SRT-8 for under $50k... you won't be able to get a CTS-V for under $65k. In fact, I've seen brand new SRT-8s on the lot for $42k.

If you can afford a $65k car, go for it. I just don't think I could justify the extra cost over what you can get with a loaded SRT-8.
Most of the CTS-Vs I've seen are $70K and up. Nice car, but way out of my price range! I did find the Superbee tempting when I bought my R/T.

I saw the spy photos of the SS and it sure does look like a G8 variant. That is a good thing depending on what the hood and grill look like. Could go either way. I am not overly impressed with the Chevy bowtie split grill, it reminds me of a Malibu. If they put the 6.2L in it, the price will definitely be well over $40K. The G8 GXP was $38K so you can expect low to mid 40s at least, and that is without a blower.

GTO_04
__________________
2012 Dodge Charger R/T Tungsten
2006 Pontiac GTO Impulse Blue
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #79  
Old 12-11-2012, 04:28 PM
MCO_Carter's Avatar
MCO_Carter MCO_Carter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kokomo, IN
Posts: 3,554
Thanks: 3
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by AFPVet View Post
You can get an SRT-8 for under $50k... you won't be able to get a CTS-V for under $65k. In fact, I've seen brand new SRT-8s on the lot for $42k.

If you can afford a $65k car, go for it. I just don't think I could justify the extra cost over what you can get with a loaded SRT-8.
Just from a pure "numbers" standpoint....going with Starting Prices:


For the CTS-V, you're paying $116.03 per Horsepower (556 HP, $64,515 Starting Price)
For the SRT-8, you're paying $98.91 per Horsepower (465 HP, $45,995 Starting Price)
For the Superbee, you're paying $92.46 per Horsepower (465 HP, $42,995)

For Weight the CTS-V is 4255, the SRT is 4365, and the SuperBee is 3961*


*I got that weight from Car&Driver's website...seems a little low to me, for some reason I thought the Superbee weighed in around 4150.

That gives the "Bang For The Buck" edge to Dodge
__________________

Top Banana #321
Mods
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #80  
Old 12-11-2012, 05:59 PM
13WhiteSRT 13WhiteSRT is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Amarillo, Tx
Posts: 120
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by AFPVet View Post
You can get an SRT-8 for under $50k... you won't be able to get a CTS-V for under $65k. In fact, I've seen brand new SRT-8s on the lot for $42k.

If you can afford a $65k car, go for it. I just don't think I could justify the extra cost over what you can get with a loaded SRT-8.
Exactly.. THAT is the point. Why do people on this site want to continually compare these cars? Why not compare to an Audi R8 or a BMW 7 series as well? "For the price", an SRT 8 cannot be beat. If you're one of those gold chain types that have to brag that their CTSV is the baddest sedan on the road, blah,blah.blah; and, have the coin, go for it and PLEASE GO TO A CTSV SITE, to expose your new found love. I saw another poster exclaiming how the CTSV handle so much better at 140 plus.....I'm sure I do that ALL THE TIME on my commutes:rolleyes2 My question to him is: Is there any differance at all at 70mph? Probably not, and if there is, it most likely negligible. Sure want to pay an extra 15 grand for that!

Is it too much to ask to go to a Dodge Charger site and talk about Chargers?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Reply

  Dodge Charger Forums > Off-Topic Area > Off-Topic

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Dodge Charger Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Another SRT competitor. CTown R/T R&T Off-Topic 103 12-22-2012 07:04 PM
GM's Charger competitor MCaesar Off-Topic 195 08-28-2012 05:59 PM
Well, it looks like our best competitor is coming back for round 2.... nealuss Off-Topic 7 02-23-2011 07:33 AM
Is the new Taurus a legit competitor to the Charger? MCaesar General Charger Discussion 52 07-12-2007 07:14 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:02 PM.



Powered by vBulletin®. Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© AutoGuide